Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 22:01:33 -0600 Subject: Re: secular? >Lisa Rogers wrote: > >> Jerry, could you clarify for me the meaning of "secular" in this >> context. I have a general sense, but... >> >>> <glevy-AT-acnet.pratt.edu> 3/31/96, 05:53am >>> >> On the one hand, public schools have deteriorated and youth are more >> affected by a graphic or vocal message than a printed one (witness >> the amount of hrs/day that students sit in front of the TV). On the >> other hand, larger and larger percentages of people are being >> admitted to and graduating from college (a secular trend since the >> 1960's). > >ongoing/continuous. > >"going on from age to age; continuing through long ages" (_The Random >House Dictionary_). > >Jerry Funny. Physicists have a more precise usage, which I thought was what was meant when I saw phrases like the above. A function shows a secular change in time if its amplitude monotonically increases or decreases, but not if it oscillates. I was happy that this concept had gotten out into the public. Oh well. Rahul --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005