Date: Mon, 15 Apr 96 13:32:05 GMT Subject: Re: France's Hot December - 2 2. Causes i) Budget Deficits The immediate cause was Juppe's attack on a variety of fronts, centrally on the number of years public sector workers would have to work before recieving their pensions - increasing from 37.5 years to 40 years. But also in his plan were attacks on health and benifits, a .5% increase in income tax, and removing the trade unions from control over health insurance. There were plans to privatise rail, amongst others. But this has a "first cause" , namely, the need to reduce the budget deficit in order to satisfy the conditions for EMU, although "interestingly, much of the pressure for the cutbacks comes from rival groups [ ie, rival to the "Euro integrationists" ] inside the ruling class and the conservative parties, who are hostile to EMU." The size of this budget deficit has its own "first causes" , a general one applying to all developed countries and a particular one applying to Europe. BUDGET DEFICITS IN GENERAL. Harman quotes the Financial Times : "The US has one. The Europeans have one, and now even Japan has one. What do they all have ? A serious fiscal problem. This is the theme of the decade, one that will shape the rhythm of financial life and form the cacaphonic background sound to political debate in almost every industrial country". Harman locates the cause as the lower rate of growth in the 80s and 90's than in the 50's, 60's and 70's ( and which elsewhere he related to the fall in the underlying rate of profit ). Again, the FT : "The overall ratio of spending to GNP stabilised in the early 80's. It did so, however, at levels that governments were unable or unwilling to fund ... The deficits ... increased the ratio of debt to GNP from 41 % in 1980 to 72% in 1995. Unfunded pension promises ensure that there is worse to come almost everywhere." EUROPE IN PARTICULAR "In the 50's, 60's + 70's [European Capitalist States] were able to enjoy high rates of profit and rapidly growing economies while making substantial concessions to workers over wages, hours, and wlefare - either as a response to high levels of industrial struggle ( Belgium 1960-61, France 68, Italy 69 - 75 ) or in order to preempt such struggles ( Scandanavia, West Germany )" Despite attempts to reverse these reforms, European capital is still at a disadvantage vs Japan and US Capitalism. "Its productivity levels are lower than in either Japan or the US, the real wages it pays higher than the US ( but not Japan ) , and its employees work far fewer hours". "Nor is that all". The average US worker works three weeks longer than in 1980, while French workers two weeks less than in 1980" ie the trend is moving the opposite way to the way the capitalists would want it to. ii) Juppe's Tactics. To cut a long story short, Juppe ignored the lessons of Thatcherism and the Ridley Plan, which took a "salami" approach - attack each section of workers slice by slice, making concessions when necessary to avoid excessive generalisation. ( As eventually did Thatcher - discuss ). He did this because ( Harmanesque "first causes" again ! ) the ruling class were becoming very uneasy about his apparent concessions to workers demands before and after his landslide election ( shown by a near run on the franc ). "There was more panic than forethought to Juppe's 'coup' ". "He also made ... serious error". He had upset what had been the big trade union most amenable to the schemes of French Capitalism, Force Ouvriere." The FO had arisen from a right split from the Communist CGT and had been allowed to organise many civil servants and key positions in the employer - union committees that ran the 300 billion franc ( !! ) welfare insurance scheme. Not only did Juppe attack the benifits themselves - he attacked the role of the union leaders in administering the scheme itself. "The poodle turned bitterly on its master". However, the leader of the CFDT ( close to the Socialist Party ) , Nicole Notat, welcomed the "reform", asking for negotiation. Perhaps this led Juppe to believe the protests would only be symbolic. He was wrong. Adam. Adam Rose SWP Manchester UK --------------------------------------------------------------- --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005