From: LeoCasey-AT-aol.com Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 15:08:40 -0400 Subject: Re: marxism2-digest V1 #135 In a message dated 96-05-29 08:09:20 EDT, Jeff Johnson writes: >I believe that the postmodernist >argument logically requires some sort of private language. I don't see where you get this premise from. Yes, I agree that language is necessarily public (or shared, or collective), but that is also a position shared by many post-Marxists. This assertion requires some argument. (I also remain skeptical of the value of the category postmodernist when used in this way, ie, that there is something resembling a consensus post-modernist argument.) --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005