Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 01:44:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Schwartz <jschwart-AT-freenet.columbus.oh.us> Subject: Re: Dogmatism On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, Adam Rose wrote: > Having said this, this does not absolve marxists from the need > to take up each argument that eg there is a parliamentary road, > so other class can bring about socialism, in a concrete manner, > specific to each counter argument. When I got drawn into a > discussion over Cuba with Louis and others, my basic weakness > was that I just didn't know much about Cuba ( which I now made > some effort to overcome ) , so my general but correct argument > could not really disprove Louis' concrete but incorrect one. > > Of course, this doesn't apply if the person you're arguing with > is called Justin. Because I don't know, or perhaps say, anything concrete> Because your general arguments cannot disdprove mine? Because you can't learn anything >from me? What do you mean? --JUstin --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005