File spoon-archives/marxism2.archive/marxism2_1996/96-09-20.183, message 131


Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 01:44:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Justin Schwartz <jschwart-AT-freenet.columbus.oh.us>
Subject: Re: Dogmatism



On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, Adam Rose wrote:

> Having said this, this does not absolve marxists from the need
> to take up each argument that eg there is a parliamentary road,
> so other class can bring about socialism, in a concrete manner, 
> specific to each counter argument. When I got drawn into a
> discussion over Cuba with Louis and others, my basic weakness
> was that I just didn't know much about Cuba ( which I now made
> some effort to overcome ) , so my general but correct argument
> could not really disprove Louis' concrete but incorrect one.
> 
> Of course, this doesn't apply if the person you're arguing with
> is called Justin.

Because I don't know, or perhaps say, anything concrete> Because your
general arguments cannot disdprove mine? Because you can't learn anything
>from me? What do you mean?

--JUstin




     --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005