Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:18:32 EST Subject: Re: de Sade and de Grad-school Another point about reading Sade -- he seems to appeal to readers whose orientation toward reading is heavily biased toward ideas -- modern "figure it out" people who primarily seek to construct rules and symbol-systems and tend to undervalue emotion and charm when reading. This may be a professional disadvantage of scholars and thinkers in that they can discuss and evaluate ideas, but may stumble, get tongue-tied, and fall silent discussing numinous things like "charm" or "beautiful literary effect." Plus students may think they're flakes, asking for appreciations instead of explications. Besides the wicked chic that spawned a cottage industry near his old chateau, Sade may appeal to people who fear the non-idea aspect of art. They may want ideas from literature for reasons of their own personal identity. These imaginary ideaholics can see Sade pre-Freuding Freud, pre-Nietzsching Nietzsche, pre-Jarrying Alfred Jarry, and so on. They can overlook the boring and the gross because -- oh boy! -- thar's some of them thar ideas in that thar dirty book! Maybe Sade the libertine is popular because, paradoxically, postmodern readers live too much in their heads. Eric NYC --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed --- This message may have contained attachments which were removed. Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005