File spoon-archives/nietzsche.archive/nietzsche_1995/nietzsche.Feb.95.16-23, message 41


Date: Mon, 20 Feb 1995 16:35:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Alon Harel <aharel-AT-Law.USC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Eternal return as scientific doctrine


Common sense of course. 

On Mon, 20 Feb 1995 CND7750-AT-utarlg.uta.edu wrote:

> I must say that you have not understood what i said at all. The Nietzsche
> list is hardly the place to preach 'normic and true for all knowers'
> conditions. I have present an interpretaion of the ER that takes into
> account the entire history of the philosophical concept of causality,
> and i have indicated that the ER is directed against Kantianism and
> concepts like 'true for all knowers'. I find it hard to believe that
> you have really thought much at all about Nietzschean philosophy so
> long as you resopnd with 'common sense' and 'normic conditions'. Nor
> would my mention of evaluation be 'unclear' if you had bothered
> to read _The Genealogy of Morals_ and 'understood' wath Nietzsche is
> saying there. If you wish to talk abut Nietzschean philosophy in
> Nietzsche's terms, and nt under the pretenses of 'normality' i will
> be happy to continue--otherwise, we have little to say.
> 
> Forget postmodernism. I don't think i ever claimed to be postmodern.
> I'm willing to say that i have delineated what the ER means 'for all
> knowers' and will dig up more evidence to support my hypothesis if
> you wish to discuss what Nietzsche meant by ER and not what 'normalacy'
> dictates we accept. What do you say? Do yo want to talk Nietzschean
> philosophy or about common sense?
> 
> chris
> 
> 
> 	--- from list nietzsche-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu ---
> 


	--- from list nietzsche-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005