Date: Mon, 20 Feb 1995 16:35:58 -0800 (PST) From: Alon Harel <aharel-AT-Law.USC.EDU> Subject: Re: Eternal return as scientific doctrine Common sense of course. On Mon, 20 Feb 1995 CND7750-AT-utarlg.uta.edu wrote: > I must say that you have not understood what i said at all. The Nietzsche > list is hardly the place to preach 'normic and true for all knowers' > conditions. I have present an interpretaion of the ER that takes into > account the entire history of the philosophical concept of causality, > and i have indicated that the ER is directed against Kantianism and > concepts like 'true for all knowers'. I find it hard to believe that > you have really thought much at all about Nietzschean philosophy so > long as you resopnd with 'common sense' and 'normic conditions'. Nor > would my mention of evaluation be 'unclear' if you had bothered > to read _The Genealogy of Morals_ and 'understood' wath Nietzsche is > saying there. If you wish to talk abut Nietzschean philosophy in > Nietzsche's terms, and nt under the pretenses of 'normality' i will > be happy to continue--otherwise, we have little to say. > > Forget postmodernism. I don't think i ever claimed to be postmodern. > I'm willing to say that i have delineated what the ER means 'for all > knowers' and will dig up more evidence to support my hypothesis if > you wish to discuss what Nietzsche meant by ER and not what 'normalacy' > dictates we accept. What do you say? Do yo want to talk Nietzschean > philosophy or about common sense? > > chris > > > --- from list nietzsche-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu --- > --- from list nietzsche-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005