From: stelac!stelac.filo.uba.ar!ayesha-AT-ccc.uba.ar
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 95 05:11 GMT-3:00


 
> Personally, this is the manner in which I try to understand it
> also.  However, I suspect that this is not the case with
> Nietzsche.  Consider his description of how that notion/concept
> came to him: an epiphany of staggering intensity.  Also consider
> the limited degree to which he expands upon it.  Perhaps, our
> difficulty in grasping it reflects the incommensurability of
> that notion/concept with our habituated way of thinking.

	yes, jim, i think it's all right, but which is "our habituated way
of thinking". maybe our in-der-welt-sein? if we have a weltaanschaung
about the time, this weltanschaaung is a fiction, too (like the e.r.)
if this is "true", the important change is to think the assumptions 
about the fiction.



	"No hay hechos, solo hay interpretaciones"

	(F.N.)



                                   stella accorinti  
                                   ayesha-AT-stelac.filo.uba.ar


	--- from list nietzsche-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------