Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 18:35:31 -0400 (edt)
From: Seamus Malone <redye-AT-amanda.dorsai.org>
Subject: Re: eliminating recuperation: ethical stoicism


On Mon, 14 Aug 1995 CND7750-AT-utarlg.uta.edu wrote:

> i forgot to add the the general consensus among the critics
> was that there is simply no depth to tarantino's work, no
> real psycho-drama, just all-out surface materiality minus
> real intecllectual stimulation. these critics are obviously
> not materialists, but certainly posty oriented in the lefty
> kind of way. the problem they had with tarantino was that,
> philosophically, he was too damned fatalistic. Nietzsche
> would no doubt love it.
> 
> chris
> 
I think he would have enjoyed laughing at the critics, I don't think he 
would have enjoyed tarantino- hardly the grand style. He might have 
enjoyed the cmic elements, the kid get his head blown all over the wind 
shield. I think he would have resented any association of his theorys 
with the body of Tarrantino's rather vapid work- he was just lke that you 
know.

Seamus Malone
redye-AT-amanda.dorsai.org
http://www.dorsai.org/~redye


                         ________________ __
                           ][ ]E (C ]H ]N ]E
               _____________________________________
               d e s i g n  -  m u l t i - m e d i a
 
                 (7  1  8)  3  8  3  -  6  9  8  8 
                       ______________________
                    http://www.dorsai.org/~redye




	--- from list nietzsche-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu ---

     ------------------