From: "Jesse bloom" <essej-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: be civil!
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 05:45:28 PDT




>From owner-nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Sat Jul  4 04:51:03 
1998
>Received: (from domo-AT-localhost) by lists.village.Virginia.EDU 
(8.8.5/8.6.6) id HAA64287 for nietzsche-outgoing; Sat, 4 Jul 1998 
07:30:36 -0400
>X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender 
to owner-nietzsche-AT-localhost using -f
>Received: from ns1.dmv.com (ns1.dmv.com [207.124.184.2]) by 
lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA38938 for 
<nietzsche-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU>; Sat, 4 Jul 1998 07:30:27 -0400
>Received: from vision.dmv.com (mfd4-12.dmv.com [207.124.189.51])
>	by ns1.dmv.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id HAA04670
>	for <nietzsche-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU>; Sat, 4 Jul 1998 07:30:26 
-0400 (EDT)
>	(envelope-from jtduryea-AT-dmv.com)
>From: "John T. Duryea" <jtduryea-AT-dmv.com>
>To: <nietzsche-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU>
>Subject: Re: be civil!
>Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 07:30:47 -0500
>Message-ID: <01bda747$92411fa0$33bd7ccf-AT-vision.dmv.com>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>	charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
>Sender: owner-nietzsche-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: nietzsche-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>
>
>
>>I have a very elementary thought, do hear me out. what do you all 
think
>>of the judicial system today? the enforcement of moral judgement is
>>affected by Intention eg manslaughter,insanity, drunkdriving   . well
>>what would you all think of that ? is it a somewhat adequate and fair
>>system of morality ?  what would N have to say about this ?
>>
>>
>>jesse
>>
>
>
>BGE 32 addresses the need for the physiognomic sceptic to value most 
highly
>that which is not intentional in an action.
>
>However, just as the "democratic movement inherits the christian", we 
see
>creeping into the judicial system greater and greater weight placed on
>"concious" intentions. This is part and parcel of the victim ideology 
of
>crucifiction.
>
>John T. Duryea
>


well, i know for sure that if any one of my loved ones or even me were 
to be arrested for doing something "accidently" which was wrong, i would 
be grateful if my initial intentions were noted. lets get rid of the 
victim and the "christianess" of it , who would the judicial system 
benefit? would it benefit itself if it took note of my intentions or 
anyone else's intentions? and how would THIS affect the general idea of 
MORALITY ? retro-active judgements ,.. are they fair? or is fairness a 
proposition of the winner.

jb




______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


	--- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---