From: lambdac-AT-globalserve.net Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 01:11:01 -0500 Subject: Re: The New Idols will not do Abdalbarr - bombarding us with the good scholar will not do. Even he, the hypercatholic, managed to acknowledge that Nietzsche's atheism, being sui generis, had space for precisely what Spinoza had put _in there_ (Nietzsche was just against the moral God...), in the finite Space and the infinite Time. But all this refined talk between monads communicating 'a travers les fils du temps' hinges on one little detail, the phenomenological character of ALL knowledge. If only science could have cracked that uncertainty...but it didn't, did it? That's where all scholastic philosophers derive their ultimate comfort. So listen, it is true, heidi hens were never so eloquent as to quote their master, or its derridaesque re-edition - yet, remain reminded that those fundamental uncertainties might well belong to an epoch which does not _know_ nor, what is more appalling, does not want to learn. Its return will surely be precluded. For god matters nothing when death touches your shoulder with her gentle tap. LC PS- ô mediumatic fishwife supreme, why hast thou articulated not that substantial criticism of Heidi you so desire and crave for? >To base a critique of Heideggerian thought on the >fact that Heidy was a nazi wanna-be is a craven criticism. Something more > substantial is required. We are all long ears. --- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005