From: henry sholar <hwsholar-AT-uncg.edu> Subject: Re: god and gramm Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 07:16:23 -0500 On Thu, 30 Jul 1998 15:08:26 -0600 Cyprus <sadecamus-AT-SPRINTMAIL.COM> wrote: > Mr. Sholar, > > well, since you reject all absolutes--absolutely, I might add--, how the > hell do you know for certain that we are not talking about logic? I am > afraid, Mr. Sholar, that we are locked into logic as we are locked into > grammar. And, thus, if Nietzsche is correct, we cannot avoid being > theists--if only by habit. > > Inspector Toodles > dear and beloved old knucklehead-tryin'-tuh-knock-some-sense-intuh-everbody's-haid-sweet-old friend-(intimate-for years)-Paul, i didn't reject any of your absolutes, Paul, nor did I not reject them not absolutely either. I simply pointed out to you that, while you are assuming for the sake of a rather old, dusty, and boring box-like view of "reason" and "reality" that 'we' weren't gonna fit in that box. Come on Paul, go, let the fly out of the flybottle, spread your little wings! ---------------------- henry sholar hwsholar-AT-uncg.edu --- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005