From: lambdac-AT-globalserve.net Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 10:22:27 -0500 Subject: Enough, but enough - Oh hen! >Perhaps it would benefit us all greatly to learn >how Kelly Timothy Lynch understands Nietzsche, >And be struck by how seriously we must take Lynch's understanding since >it will no doubt be a "pure" Nietzsche as opposed to Heidegger's. As we >all know, he somehow willfully contaminated his understanding of >Nietzsche. (something I am sure Nietzsche would be aghast to have >happen.) > >(all comments submitted with a kind of halfway smile) >kindest regards, >hen Smile not for long as if hens could swallow canaries - for let us just stop halfway through your smile: can anyone read anything (not anybody, any 'author') without contaminating that reading by one's living? Guess not - or will you dare to contradict? If not, very well then, all that matters is whether the Nietzsche that rings in your ears comes with the figure of the Heidi-daddy or some other fac-simile, _or_ the figure of _another thinker_ (not another clown), an intercessor, who at least attempted honestly and legitimately to interpret Nietzsche. Lo and behold, suddenly interpretation, and its legitimacy, count for nothing, eh? They are good to discard logic and even absolutes, but useless with regards to a little cephalic reading of our Heidi? You might be surprised - Kelly's reading of Nietzsche may yet prove it can teach you something. LC --- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005