File spoon-archives/nietzsche.archive/nietzsche_1998/nietzsche.9809, message 87


From: Sean Saraq <sean_saraq-AT-environics.ca>
Subject: RE: The Higher man vs Overman
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 02:05:53 -0400


I'll admit that my understanding of Hegel is about as limited as my
understanding of Christianity. But you don't have to eat an entire plate
of shit to know that it is shit.

Sean

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Brian Manning Delaney [SMTP:b-delaney-AT-uchicago.edu]
> Sent:	Saturday, September 26, 1998 1:32 PM
> To:	nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> Subject:	Re: The Higher man vs Overman
> 
> 
> Sean Saraq <sean_saraq-AT-environics.ca> wrote
> 
> > Yes, well I guess we'll have to agree to
> > disagree about the possibility of being a
> > Hegelian and a Nietzschean at the same time.
> > Hegelians do, of course, see possibilities of "rapprochement"
> > all over the place where none exist.
> 
> Nietzscheans (self-styled) do, of course, make recourse to
> their understanding of Hegel where none exists. (Since we're
> being so friendly.)
> 
> > p.s. I think Derrida is awful and has given
> > contemporary French philosophy a bad name. It is
> > a disgrace that great thinkers on Nietzsche like
> > Deleuze and Haar are so often lumped in with his
> > crap. 
> 
> Dig it. I think Derrida's stuff on Nietzsche is insipid. I
> was speaking about his stuff on Hegel, which is excellent.
> 
> Good luck,
> Brian.
> 
> 
> 	--- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


	--- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005