File spoon-archives/nietzsche.archive/nietzsche_1998/nietzsche.9810, message 78


Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:10:53 -0600
From: Daniel Dzenkowski <djdzenko-AT-students.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: god


At 12:12 PM 10/30/98 -0500, Paul S. Rhodes wrote:
>>I do not think that there is a paradox in N's case of God. Your Beckett's
>>understanding comes from not having a sense that existence precedes the
>>qualia. God would look like respectively as an effect that takes a form of
>>**subsistence** in 'its' existence. A metamorphoses that has a degree of
>>movement, an attribute of the univocity of being that met its destiny.
>>
>>God is dead!!! In its death, life returns
>>
>>amdib
>
>Geez, you academics are a humourless lot, aren't you?

Academics don't know how to laugh, and isin't laughing of such a great
importance when dealing with such dangerous thoughts.  

Dan



	--- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005