Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:35:40 +0100
From: Syphon Soul <haengen-AT-c2i.net>
Subject: Re: Zarathsutra Continued


"Daniel J. Dzenkowski" wrote:

>         So this begs the question what is an immoralist?  How does Nietzsche show
> that he is an immoralist?
>
>         --- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

  Of course, this my opinion and my opinion alone.

  An immoralist is someone who does not follow the "rules" and "values" oneself does
set as "truths", or Right if you wish. This meaning, if one does changes ones view,
one is not an immoralist, provided that one does change it as a consequence of what
another does think, do, or say, without using you will, or amor fati if you wish, to
incorporate  these words, thoughts or acts into yourself. This meaning, your reaction
to morals are not what makes you immoral, but how you take these virtues and use
them.

  This meaning Nietzsche was NOT an immoralist, seeing as he always took others'
words and made them his by adding his will. IF he can be called an immoralist it is
because he made doctrines, words, and postulates of his own.

 I would not call that immoral.

 Syphon Soul

 "Par Ardua Ad Astra"




	--- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---