From: "James Kennedy" <jameske3001-AT-clara.co.uk> Subject: Re: Splitters! Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 18:40:10 +0100 In principle I agree with you BUT that takes us into a long and drawn out issue of what constitutes worthiness which is really unnecessary. All that is really required is an agreement, by all those interested in critically appraising Nietzsche, to delete are the dross as it is posted, or not to answer it at all. jameske ----- Original Message ----- From: <ma-AT-panix.com> To: <nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:21 PM Subject: Re: Splitters! > James wrote: > > > The suggestions of Ruth and Patrick sound sensible to me, and I > > for one support splitting this list to into those that wish to enter into > > crticial discussions on Nietzsche and those that do not. > > Yes, I would almost agree that this is a sensible suggestion, except for one > detail. A list made up of those who _wish_ to enter into "critical discussions > of Nietzsche" seems a bit flabby; good discussions are not woven from "wishes". > Instead, the task before us, it would seem, is to create a list of those > who _have what it takes_ to enter such discussions; then we can have another > list populated by those who wish to enter into critical discussion of Nietzsche > but don't have what it takes, and still another made up of those who don't > even wish to enter. I could draw up an exam that people would take in order > to be placed on the right list. And maybe we need a fourth list of people > who have what it takes to enter critical discussions of Nietzsche but don't > wish to. > > > -m > > > --- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > --- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005