From: "Paul Murphy" <Villanova-AT-btopenworld.com> Subject: Re: that hitler? Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:39:56 +0200 no, Stalin made the pact in order to buy time, so that he might build up the army. S wasn't naive, but sometimes his purges (of army officers) got in way of other things... ----- Original Message ----- From: "BRIAN M. STANSBERRY" <BMS4880-AT-tntech.edu> To: <nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:39 AM Subject: Re: that hitler? > > > From: Scribe1865-AT-aol.com > > > > The national socialists had socialized health care, paid vacations for > > workers, all the usual goodies you'd expect from something named the > > nationalist socialist German worker's partei. > > The Nazis were very right wing. The Germans considered them right-wing. > They began largely as an anti-immigration party under... that guy-- > I can't think of his name-- Ernest something. If you look at the early > propaganda, it was highly nationalistic, anti-international. > > > their division on the Spanish civil war with the Molotov/Ribbentrop pact) > > would also seem an easy argument to make against it. > > Hitler never intended to keep this pact with the Soviets. The Russians > receive a pretty low ranking in _Mein Kampf_. Not as low as the Jews, but > pretty close. Stalin was just naive to the whole thing. > > Now, Scribels-- before you embarrass yourself further, get off this > burned-out, abhorrent topic, and move on to something else. How about, > say, the Christian concept of death, like that dimwit a few months ago > wanted to discuss. > > > > - Brian S. > > > > --- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > --- from list nietzsche-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005