Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 20:25:33 -0500
From: George Trail <gtrail-AT-UH.EDU>
Subject: Re: PLC: After Irene Hossack



>
>($<>a) if in Lacanian mathemes you're savvy. Interesting, though, how Kant
>pops up preceding the above statement. Symptomatic? The love relation is,
>you know, eminently reversible, (a<>$), *avec Sade*. The droning Prof,
>reduced, in his fantasy whose object has died out, to the humility of
>serfdom to jouissance, beating words into student Things (blank-eyed
>staring), to the tune of the Other's enjoyment. Oh how ek-static!
>
>jestfully yours,
>
>James
I mean, like, were I you, that's exactly what I would have said. At least
you didn't use an emoticon, but the "jestfully" is suspect. One can, after
all, trust emoticons, but words are just "so" slippery.
boogie on,
g




     --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---