File spoon-archives/phillitcrit.archive/phillitcrit_1998/phillitcrit.9801, message 58


From: Patsloane <Patsloane-AT-aol.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 14:03:43 EST
Subject: Re: PLC: Cultural studies (Was Henry Miller...)


In a message dated 98-01-05 11:50:43 EST, GT write:

> Well then, he asked curiously, what do you "assume" costitutes the
>  "foundation" of Judaism?
>  g

Maybe the simplest way to answer your question is to say the OT is the
foundation for both Judaism and Christianity, but Christianity is anti-
foundational and Judaism is not. 

Your question is framed in kind of a patronizing, sarcastic way. Why? If you
were annoyed by something I said, I'd appreciate your just telling me what it
is in an upfront way.  Or correct me if I've misread your "rhetoric."

pat


     --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005