File spoon-archives/phillitcrit.archive/phillitcrit_2000/phillitcrit.0007, message 163


Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:59:06 -0400
From: Barron <gebarron-AT-InfoAve.Net>
Subject: Re: VS: PLC: Marxist Propaganda


On 7/16/00 10:00 PM zatavu-AT-excite.com wrote:

> I'm not saying scientists don't perform bad science. Some certainly do. But
> science itself does work the way I have stated, or we would still be in the
> stone age - or at least the pre-scientific age.

Today's enlightenment is tomorrow's dark age.

> You just pointed out that
> you have proven evolution to happen yourself in the lab with microorganisms.

Troy, please, stay with me here. I get it. Microbes evolve. My point, and
I'll say this slowly, you can't generalize what happens to all life forms
based on microbes. That's all I was saying. This is the type of scientific
hard-headedness I'm talking about. This is what evolutionists do.
Extrapolating what microbes do, how creatures are catagorized taxonomically,
how they change embryonically, how their comparative anatomy is similar ALL
make good sense. They are all true but the relationship between these
observations and what ACTUALLY happened have not been scientifically
(exposed to the experimental model) proven. Yet we accept it as so; do we
not?

> Ever heard of Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle? It's never going to
> happen. If you stop an electron to tell where it is, then it's really no
> longer orbitting. Besides, as a scientist, you should know...................

Yadda, yadda yadda. That was, of course, my whole point Troy. Science is
limited. That, in fact, was my WHOLE point. Science is limited. Man is
limited. Science is thought to be boundless. It isn't. Finally we agree.



     --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005