Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:23:36 -0500 From: "George Y. Trail" <gtrail-AT-UH.EDU> Subject: Re: PLC: Re: Ethics/Aesthetics (was: Literary Saints) But do you think they would? I see nothing in your post that any of these figures would take issue with. g Douve1-AT-aol.com wrote:> > Fish and Bloom and Egalton and Abrams and Shelly and Mallarme can all > disagree with me contemporaneously or posthomously. I'm not terribly > interested in that. > > It simply seems to me that we are in the business of asking questions, of > having converstations about various texts, be they literary or social or > both, and that we could do that without getting all territorial and, a-hem, > bourgeois about it. > > in peace, > Simone > > --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005