File spoon-archives/phillitcrit.archive/phillitcrit_2000/phillitcrit.0008, message 224


Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:23:36 -0500
From: "George Y. Trail" <gtrail-AT-UH.EDU>
Subject: Re: PLC: Re: Ethics/Aesthetics (was: Literary Saints)


But do you think they would? I see nothing in your post that any of
these figures would take issue with. 

g

Douve1-AT-aol.com wrote:> 
> Fish and Bloom and Egalton and Abrams and Shelly and Mallarme can all
> disagree with me contemporaneously or posthomously.  I'm not terribly
> interested in that.
> 
> It simply seems to me that we are in the business of asking questions, of
> having converstations about various texts, be they literary or social or
> both, and that we could do that without getting all territorial and, a-hem,
> bourgeois about it.
> 
> in peace,
> Simone
> 
>      --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


     --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005