File spoon-archives/phillitcrit.archive/phillitcrit_2000/phillitcrit.0008, message 81


From: Patsloane-AT-aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 10:35:28 EDT
Subject: Re: PLC: Howard on Mein Kampf (was Fairness to Faulner)


In a message dated 8/9/00 5:53:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
hhasting-AT-osf1.gmu.edu writes:

> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 Patsloane-AT-aol.com wrote:
>  
>  > As we're not doing a very good job of resolving racism, sexism, and 
>  > antisemitism, I think we may need to study the process much more closely 
> and 
>  > in its entirety. And I mean serious study in depth, not just a lot of 
>  > histrionic ranting and raving about who are supposed to be the good guys 
> and 
>  > who are supposed to be the bad guys. 
>  
>  Well how might that be accomplished in an email discussion? In a
>  previous thread I have argued that one reason why people link Nazism
>  with Marxism to obscure the roots of Nazism in still valued cultural
>  traditions.  Is that worth looking into or is that still me being part of
>  the problem?
>  
>  So far I have argued on the Faulkner thread that 
>  
>    1.  Racism can be built into a novelist's apparently ordinary 
>        description of one character's reaction to another.
>  
>    2.  That this occurs in Faulkners work, and I have offered an 
>        example thereof.

Howard,

Let's stop here. As I believe you said you didn't know much about Faulkner, 
could we talk about an author you feel you know about?

Otherwise, I'm going to get flashbacks to those dreadful Phil-lit bashes in 
which Heidegger was being resoundingly trounced. And if one made discreet 
inquiries offline (as I did), one found that a goodly number of those right 
in the thick of it had never read anything written by Heidegger.

> Well a person who takes a thoughtful approach, reading only literary
>  analyses and biographies of Eliot, might assume that the charge rests on
>  several lines in Ara Vos Prec.

HH, I'm going to let you in on a little secret of literary studies. Part of 
studying a writer is reading what that writer wrote, not just reading about 
the writer. As I gather you skip that part in cultural studies, I'll not ask 
you if you happen to know which poems or lines in Ara Vos Prec are at issue.

>  But a more reductive person, who is aware that charges of anti-semitism
>  have been around since Eliot refused support fellow writers and academics
>  in a protest of the fate of Jewish writers and academics during Hitler's
>  rise to power, 

I believe this involved a petition he refused to sign on the grounds that it 
was exploiting the misery of others for purposes of self-promotion. Same 
issue came up over and over during Vietnam War. Artists were being repeatedly 
asked to submit paintings for exhibitions "to protest the war."  The point 
was made (rightly in my opinion) that this was an inexcusable ego trip. That 
the exhibition would promote the names of the participating artists and not 
do a thing to stop the war. If you're interested enough in this to do some 
reading, Roger Kojecky is a good person...one of the few who took the time to 
get his facts straight on Eliot's political activities and views.

was much disucssed by Marxist writers in the 70s and 80s,
>  and would be quite passe in cultural studies circles at present--such a
>  person would assume that there are and have been different groups finding
>  antisemitism in Eliot to different degrees and on different grounds.

1) What were the Marxist writers gabbing about in the 70s and 80s? A petition 
that Eliot objected to signing in the 1930s?  Did any of the "Marxist 
writers" publish any of their much discussed views on T. S. Eliot?  If not, 
and these are more pals of yours, do you happen to know any of their names?

2) To the extent that you're trying to pass off "Marxist writers" as friends 
of the Jews, this indeed I wasn't aware of.
>  
>  The cultural studies folks I know would focus on Eliot's vision of a
>  hierarchical, organic culture suffused with Christian influence. This
>  because of the connections to much protofascist conceptions of
>  culture. 
>  
>  Sounds like you know a lot about
>  Eliot.  And you find his combination of  "Christiantiy" and
>  "culture" rather innocous.  What is the place of Jews in the organic,
>  hierarchical society he envisions?  Is there, perhaps one, only one,
>  derogatory paragraph speaking to this matter?  What does it say?
>  
>  hh


     --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005