Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:31:32 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: PLC: Activity


I certainly agree, but I have heard more Marx than seems ethically
tolerable. I am going to prepare a message soon about critical theory,
because it is a relatively complex discipline that can use some
definition. 
Cheers, tootles
Peter

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, George Y. Trail wrote:

> Surely any ideological position can be included as a framework for
> critical inquiry, and as surely any of them can be "left out."  There is
> certainly a large body of Marxist literary criticism, with Jameson as
> the most available and prolific practitioner, as there is a large body
> of Freudian literary criticism, feminist literary criticism, and etc.  
> g
> 
> zatavu-AT-excite.com wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:21:28 -0400 (EDT),
> > phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu wrote:
> > 
> > >  On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Peter Christopher Rugh wrote:
> > >
> > >   I am still
> > >  > puzzled about the significance of critical theory in America and if
> > Marx
> > >  > can be left out of it.
> > >
> > >  He is left out of it pretty much, so I guess he can be.
> > 
> > He is? Not at USM or here at UTD. And personally, I don't think he can be
> > left out of it at all. Marxist theory is quite important, I think.
> > 
> > Troy Camplin
> > >
> > >  hh
> > >  .....................................................................
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >       --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> > 
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Say Bye to Slow Internet!
> > http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
> > 
> >      --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> 
> 
>      --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> 
> 



     --- from list phillitcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---