Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:28:04 +1000 From: "dr.woooo" <dr.woooo-AT-nomasters.org> Subject: [postanarchism] matrix, the left reloaded my mate nik had this to say in response to zizek's recent piece on the matrix reloaded. 26-06-2003 the Left reloaded its gratifying to know that zizek didn’t really have much more to say on the matrix than my friends (for some reason ive decided – without really reading anything he’s written – to foster a strong dislike for zizek. Maybe its all the z’s in his name). there was one thing he said though that we didn’t – the whole “lesson for the Left” thing… "The filmmakers have thus dramatically raised the stakes of the Matrix series, confronting us with all the complications and confusions of the politics of liberation. And they have put themselves in a profoundly difficult spot: They now confront an almost impossible task. If the forthcoming part three, The Matrix Revolutions, is to succeed with anything like a happy ending, it will have to produce nothing less than the appropriate answer to the dilemmas of revolutionary politics today, a blueprint for the political act the left is desperately looking for. " - zizek http://inthesetimes.com/print.php?id=220_0_4_0 one of the reasons I think that my friends didn’t come up with the same thing is because im not so sure that we have the same faith in the existence of “The Left”. Well, maybe I’m not so sure about hat – but I definitely am a Leatheist. I don’t believe in the existence (or non-existence) of The Left (or the New Left, Ultra-left, the ‘Melbourne Autonomists’, etc).. What is the Left? I’m tempted to say that its just bad theorising. At the last screening steve and I held, the point was made that the concept of the multitudes was a clumsy solution to a non-problem. If the point of the concept is to create a category to bring together (and in some sense unify) bodies-under-capitalism so as to enable both the ability for those bodies to see their commonality and to enable the development of political theory, the question has to be, why bother? Why is such a unifying category necessary? Who does the category serve? And what irreconcilable differences and singularities does the category flatten in its rush for its place as a master narrative of the oppressed? Cant bodies connect themselves to together bodies, in assemblages and networks of their own creation? Cant they remain nameless, or name themselves. Cant self-identified groups and entities connect (disconnect and dissolve) themselves? Whats the fucking point of a really extensive (and vacuous) category? As far as I can tell, it just seems to serve the self proclaimed intellectual leaders on “The Left” – it lets them recuperate a diverse and non-unified set of events, bodies and organisation under a single banner that they can then say they represent, or lead (or should lead..)…. (and I'm tempted to say that the category Capitalism can serve exactly the same function vis-à-vis social relations and economic functions and forms) But what does the above mean if there is no Left? What if the multitudes is an illusion piled upon an illusion. The Left doesn’t exist – to the pile I’ll add the anti-globalisation movement, the anti-war movement, the environmental movement… take your pick. They are all names spoken to draw together a series of events and bodies that are arrayed across a previously existing conceptual field. Take the History of the Left, put the ideas into motion, then let them die – the corpse is then re-integrated into The Left as a member of movement. “The movement is the memory of the event (and the meeting is the memory of the scene)”. The Left is the memory of a series of actions, events and bodies – it’s a wake for that which has passed. But its also an attempt (by those that name) to claim ownership over the past desires and processes of various bodies and events, and all that set those desires into motion. It’s a naked grab for power. -- sig/ http://www.infoshop.org http://www.reclaimthestreets.org http://www.ainfos.ca http://slash.autonomedia.org http://www.agp.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005