File spoon-archives/postanarchism.archive/postanarchism_2003/postanarchism.0309, message 55


Subject: Re: [postanarchism] Is there anyone on this list who isn't a current or aspiring academic?
From: Tom Blancato <tblan-AT-telerama.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:57:37 -0400




I am systemtically problematical towards the idea/situation, since I 
promulgate a "thoughtaction" that realizes (I claim) a questioning of "the 
academic" probably better and more deeply than even much of what is called 
"anti-academic", since it goes ahead and reappropriates "the 
academic"/academy in an expanded and experientially realized conception of 
"thought", or even "Thought" and has it activated in a certain 
fundamentality that, I believe, exceeds the logic of "anti-academic" stuff. 
i am more or less certain this is at least *a* best option for a certain 
anti-academic impulse, and in often far better than much anti-academicism 
that falls into all too pedestrian modes and reinsciptions/recapitulations 
of the academic/non-academic division, leaving the world 
soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 
 in the usual form, etc.

tom b.

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:24:24 -0700, Aragorn! <aragorn-AT-angrynerds.com> 
wrote:

> That would be me.
>
> I would also generally state that my antagonism toward the specifically 
> academically orientated is well known.
>
> Ideas are for me and we to use.  Not them.
>
> Aragorn!
>
> Richard Singer wrote:
>
>> Not being snide here; it's just a question that has honestly occurred to 
>> me of late.  If you are someone who has nothing to do with universities 
>> and the "professional" field of academia, please speak up.
>>
>>
>> Richard
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005