Subject: Re: [postanarchism] Is there anyone on this list who isn't a current or aspiring academic? From: Tom Blancato <tblan-AT-telerama.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:57:37 -0400 I am systemtically problematical towards the idea/situation, since I promulgate a "thoughtaction" that realizes (I claim) a questioning of "the academic" probably better and more deeply than even much of what is called "anti-academic", since it goes ahead and reappropriates "the academic"/academy in an expanded and experientially realized conception of "thought", or even "Thought" and has it activated in a certain fundamentality that, I believe, exceeds the logic of "anti-academic" stuff. i am more or less certain this is at least *a* best option for a certain anti-academic impulse, and in often far better than much anti-academicism that falls into all too pedestrian modes and reinsciptions/recapitulations of the academic/non-academic division, leaving the world soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo in the usual form, etc. tom b. On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:24:24 -0700, Aragorn! <aragorn-AT-angrynerds.com> wrote: > That would be me. > > I would also generally state that my antagonism toward the specifically > academically orientated is well known. > > Ideas are for me and we to use. Not them. > > Aragorn! > > Richard Singer wrote: > >> Not being snide here; it's just a question that has honestly occurred to >> me of late. If you are someone who has nothing to do with universities >> and the "professional" field of academia, please speak up. >> >> >> Richard >> > > > -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005