File spoon-archives/postanarchism.archive/postanarchism_2003/postanarchism.0311, message 37


Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 01:20:10 -0800 (PST)
From: "J.M. Adams" <ringfingers-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [postanarchism] Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:41:07 -0800


Oh really, how does it prove that Icke isn't an
anti-Semite "for the most part" as you put it (which
would indicate that in fact, he IS an anti-Semite
since its not a matter of being "kind of" anti-Semitic
or "kind of not" anti-Semitic)?. Could you cite a page
number, as I have just read through it on Amazon's new
'search inside book' feature and found nothing of the
sort. I did however find that he made fun of Vancouver
Anti-Racist Action and the local anarchist and
activist community. He does say that "the coalition
[which included ARA] seemed to have disregarded that
many of the lizard-people that Icke had publicly named
were not Jewish" (155) and that Icke only endorsed the
Protocols of Zion so long as "Jews" were replaced with
"lizards", but none of this proves anything, certainly
not that he is not promoting an anti-Semitic worldview
based on Nazi propaganda documents as you imply.

Jason

>yes, it's quite good. and it does show that icke
isn't an anti-semite (for the 
>most part), he's just a nutter. though i don't think
>this impacts at all on 
>the discussion, as loony lizard theories are far
>outside of the realm of 
>postanarchism...

>geo

===="“Marx says, revolutions are the locomotives of world history.  But perhaps it is really totally different.  Perhaps revolutions are the grasp by the human race traveling in this train for the emergency brake.” 

- Walter Benjamin

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005