Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 01:20:10 -0800 (PST) From: "J.M. Adams" <ringfingers-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: RE: [postanarchism] Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:41:07 -0800 Oh really, how does it prove that Icke isn't an anti-Semite "for the most part" as you put it (which would indicate that in fact, he IS an anti-Semite since its not a matter of being "kind of" anti-Semitic or "kind of not" anti-Semitic)?. Could you cite a page number, as I have just read through it on Amazon's new 'search inside book' feature and found nothing of the sort. I did however find that he made fun of Vancouver Anti-Racist Action and the local anarchist and activist community. He does say that "the coalition [which included ARA] seemed to have disregarded that many of the lizard-people that Icke had publicly named were not Jewish" (155) and that Icke only endorsed the Protocols of Zion so long as "Jews" were replaced with "lizards", but none of this proves anything, certainly not that he is not promoting an anti-Semitic worldview based on Nazi propaganda documents as you imply. Jason >yes, it's quite good. and it does show that icke isn't an anti-semite (for the >most part), he's just a nutter. though i don't think >this impacts at all on >the discussion, as loony lizard theories are far >outside of the realm of >postanarchism... >geo ===="“Marx says, revolutions are the locomotives of world history. But perhaps it is really totally different. Perhaps revolutions are the grasp by the human race traveling in this train for the emergency brake.” - Walter Benjamin __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005