From: swilbur-AT-wcnet.org Subject: Re: [postanarchism] The Agreement of Zizek and Katsiafiacas on Multiculturalism Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:32:22 US/Eastern Jason says: > Here are two quotes from Zizek which absolutely concur > with Katsiaficas arguments about both the need for > coexistence with Islamic 'fundamentalism' and the > rejection of liberal multiculturalism in favor of a > more radical one: Where in the Zizek quote is there an argument about "the need for coexistence with Islamic 'fundamentalism'"? Zizek makes a claim about "big media" and the value of its "simple oppositions," but it doesn't go much beyond the realization that "things are always more complicated." Fair enough. I will also agree that "fundamentalism" is a term thrown around at times with little precision. On the other hand, there *is* such a thing as fundamentalism, and it has a particular character which, defined precisely (with reference to the christian documents, "The Fundamentals") or more broadly, as Jesse is doing, refers to *real* and *authoritarian* systems of thought. These are at odds with anarchism. Things are, indeed, "always more complicated." These is, as someone once said, "nothing outside the text." That means that to identify someone as a "fundamentalist" because they actually believe in recourse to sacred, inerrant texts or codes as the ultimate source of value is to grasp only a part of what they are and where they fit in all the fields of force and power that surround us all. But that doesn't mean that *part* can't be identified, and its significance (for questions like coexistence) can't be evaluated. Zizek argues against generalization and demonizing labels, and identifies some of the mechanisms by which "liberal multiculturalism" projects its racism on a convenient "other." One might turn the critique around again on itself, questioning whether the emerging story of simply opposition (liberal vs. radical multiculturalism) was any more adequate to the complex issues at stake. There are also serious questions about what, if anything, folks like Zizek and Badiou really have to say to anarchists, particularly ones engaged with poststructuralism. But i assume we'll get into those questions as the Badiou work is opened up. -shawn --------------------------------------------- This message was sent using Endymion MailMan. http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005