File spoon-archives/postanarchism.archive/postanarchism_2004/postanarchism.0403, message 33


Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:30:33 -0800 (PST)
From: "J.M. Adams" <ringfingers-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: [postanarchism] re: Panarchy and Badiou


There are many aspects of panarchy that I oppose but
as with most truly innovative concepts and thinkers
there are also some others that I think are really
incredible, especially for the time period in which De
Puydt was writing - however the parts that I find of
interest are precisely those which Shawn did not
mention, which have to do with the relationship
between territory, identity and polity, while the
parts I reject are oddly enough, precisely those he
did mention, about the logic of the market, etc. As
for not responding to the recent email from Sasha
about Zizek, I will bring it back in one way or
another when we start discussing Badiou, as I dont
want to get overly sidetracked on that, tit for tat
type discussion, I'd rather see where we end up going
with Badiou - one thing in particular I find strange
is how so many of the reviewers of his work found him
to be anti-statist or even anarchist, while he seems
pretty clearly to Marxist-Leninist/Maoist.
 
Jason





===="Being at one is god-like and good, but human, too human, the 
        mania
     Which insists there is only the One, one country, one truth and
         one way."

- Friedrich Hölderlin, 1799

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005