Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:30:33 -0800 (PST) From: "J.M. Adams" <ringfingers-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: [postanarchism] re: Panarchy and Badiou There are many aspects of panarchy that I oppose but as with most truly innovative concepts and thinkers there are also some others that I think are really incredible, especially for the time period in which De Puydt was writing - however the parts that I find of interest are precisely those which Shawn did not mention, which have to do with the relationship between territory, identity and polity, while the parts I reject are oddly enough, precisely those he did mention, about the logic of the market, etc. As for not responding to the recent email from Sasha about Zizek, I will bring it back in one way or another when we start discussing Badiou, as I dont want to get overly sidetracked on that, tit for tat type discussion, I'd rather see where we end up going with Badiou - one thing in particular I find strange is how so many of the reviewers of his work found him to be anti-statist or even anarchist, while he seems pretty clearly to Marxist-Leninist/Maoist. Jason ===="Being at one is god-like and good, but human, too human, the mania Which insists there is only the One, one country, one truth and one way." - Friedrich Hölderlin, 1799 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005