Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:55:55 -0700 (PDT) From: villon sasha k <il_frenetico-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [postanarchism] the great zizek debate and anti-PM Shawn, Sorry I have annoyed you. I'm a bit surprized. I'm not saying you aren't critical of bad poststructuralism. Obviously you are, especially of the simplistic attacks on "essentialism", and that I wholeheartedly support. My point, again, was a little more targeted than that. But perhaps I misunderstood some of your comments. Sorry for that. When you said: "And, honestly, the "post-structuralist identity politics" is such an obvious, self-contradictory botch that we should all probablly know better, or just drop the pretense of being critical." I thought you meant that it wasn't even worth being critical of because it was such a bad use of poststructuralism. My response was that where I was it is the main use of poststructuralism, so being critical of it is very useful to me. Wasn't trying to suggest that you were acritical in general, just that we seemed to have different priorities on this topic. I'm going to drop my other points as I don't need another contentious debate on the internet now that gets people annoyed with me. best, sasha ====------------- Anarchist Discussion Board -- Also for response to KKA, WD and Aporia: http://pub47.ezboard.com/banarchykka The Killing King Abacus Page: http://www.geocities.com/kk_abacus __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005