Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:07:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "J.M. Adams" <ringfingers-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: [postanarchism] Re: Review of Graeber - Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology Well I am not sure where you go to school, maybe you live in some kind of postie utopia or something but in almost every university that I am aware of, at least in the social sciences (from anthropology to political science) it is certainly not "a kind of cheap simplistic Foucauldianism [that]_is_ the reigning orthodoxy of the academy right now", but rather it is Rational Choice Theory and other such positivist, neoliberal, statist, capitalist traditions that rule supreme - the postie types are an underfunded, maligned minority almost everywhere, except for a few oases like Santa Cruz, Victoria, Honolulu etc., and even there they are constantly under pressure from the reigning neoliberal orthodoxy to tow the official lines of the various disciplines - its true that the rapidly aging Marxist set of professors is also maligned and under pressure to conform to the rationalized 21st century university but its also true that their approach seems less and less radical in the face of all the newer work that has come out since the Sixties, most of which is far more anarchistic in approach - but my point here is that if you really think "Foucauldianism" is reigning supreme in the academy, you are living in a world that Lynne Cheney and her comrades would love to prove is actually the case, when in fact it certainly is not... Jason ===="What war is not a private affair, and, inversely, what wound is not a war that comes from society as whole?" - Gilles Deleuze, Logique du Sens (1969) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005