Date: Thu, 02 Mar 1995 16:56:20 -0500 From: Jon Wilson <216844-AT-newschool.edu> Subject: Subaltern Studies split ?? subir wrote... > ahmad's critiques of subaltern studies, i agree, are not on solid ground, >and more along the lines of hi conception and desire for a marxist >purity. however, dipesh chakravarty and others have themselves >repidiated their earlier work in subatern studies as theoretically naive. >indeed, the collective that started the project seems to have split along >the very lines that seem to be forming here. which subalternists would you see on which 'side' of the split ??
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005