Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 01:28:20 -0500 (EST) From: Amardeep Singh <asingh-AT-emerald.tufts.edu> Subject: Rushdie everywhere Rushdie is very charming and I always find him very entertaining when he appears. Unfortunately, I'm at a loss at present as to how to read or teach his work, or even whether his work is really integral to the 'postcolonial canon' as it may be emerging from recent debates. One approach is to take his whole case as the example, media-hype, book-burnings and everything. In this vein, some have incorporated the transformation of Rushdie as an author-figure in the hype resulting from the Fatwa into their readings of his work, a move which particularly lends itself to readings of _The Satanic Verses_. (Srinivas Aravamudan's article in Diacritics did something to this effect.) Here, the 'book' is part of an integrated web of texts including everything from the text of the Fatwa itself to the newspaper articles surrounding and following the issue. The discourse following the novel reflects (in some cases, directly) the "point" that the novel is trying to make (oversimplified: modernist liberal humanism is better than regressive absolutism). If all of this is made part of the reading of _The Satanic Verses_, traditional literary reading-strategies are inadequate to the task. For me, this is complicated by the fact that _The Verses_ (like Rushdie's other work) is very much a _novel_ whose depth and value might best be approached in a fairly traditional manner- a 'postmodern' novel is, after all is hybridized and hypertextualized, still basically a novel. All of this in mind, I would like to ask the following question: which is more important at this juncture for the recipients of this message? The traditional approach, the text removed from all the hype surrounding it, as a lesson in the Novel? Or the semiotics and external politics of the public discourse surrounding the novel? If the two approaches are combined, is the result at all effective pedagogically? -Deep --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005