Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 15:31:21 +0500 From: iqbal <iqbal-AT-sdpi.org> Subject: Re: Naipaul's "Beyond Belief" The project of redeeming some 'negationism in India' asks too much politicizing. We confuse formal senses of Islam _ that depend upon certain interpretators _ with its believers' social life in different locations. Does Naipul's quote go beyond word of mouth 'experience'? You cannot erase past and preserve Arabia simultaneously, I mean. Give grace marks to the old man. Iqbal C. J. S. Wallia wrote: > Shekhar Krishnan wrote: > >There is a great danger here, as I mentioned earlier, in attempting to > >equate so-called "Muslim imperialism" (a careless term, one that glosses > >over the several dynasties of nominally Islamic rule) in the subcontinent > >with British or Western imperialism. > > ==========================================> > See the online-book by Koenraad Elst > "Negationism in India: Concealing > the Record of Islam" > at http://www.voi.org/voi/books/negaind/ > > V.S. Naipaul in "Beyond Belief" says: > > "There probably has been no imperialism > like that of Islam and the Arabs....Islam > seeks as an article of the faith to erase the > past; the believers in the end honor Arabia > alone, they have nothing to return to." > > Beyond Belief is a very persuasive book -- the best of Naipaul's nonfiction. > c.j. > > ------------------------------ > C. J. S. Wallia, Ph.D. > Publisher, IndiaStar: A Literary-Art Magazine > http://www.indiastar.com > Phone and Fax: (510) 848-8200 > P.O. Box 5582, Berkeley, CA 94705, U.S.A. > -------------------------------- > > --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005