From: "Elizabeth Deloughrey" <emd23-AT-cornell.edu> Subject: RE: post(-)colonial Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:05:56 -0500 I know Hodge and Mishra did. Their essay is also in the Williams and Chrisman reader. They argue that with the hyphen, the term refers to "oppositional post-cclonialism" and without refers to "complicit postcolonialism" (H&C 284). Regardless of the hyphen articles, I still think the best essay on forms/layers of poco is Anne McClintock's "Angel of Progress", particularly for the undergrad classroom. Liz >This might or might not be a correction. As far as I know, Ahmad first made this argument back in 1995, in his article "The politics of literary postcoloniality" (_Race and Class_ 36.3 [1995]), but didn't distinguish there between hyphenated and non-hyphenated usages of the term. --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005