Date: Mon, 27 Aug 1956 21:11:30 -0500 Subject: FW: A View from Abroad (forwarded by M. Trawick) -- "solidarity means sharing the same risks" - Che ( la solidarita significa correre gli stessi rischi) ---------- From: "r d" <ravensdown-AT-hotmail.com> To: ravensdown-AT-hotmail.com Subject: A View from Abroad (forwarded by M. Trawick) Date: Fri, Dec 1, 2000, 8:03 AM [Rcvd. from a member of the foreign service community living in Geneva, Switzerland. Please circulate broadly. JBB] A View From Abroad A history professor from Uppsala University in Sweden called to tell about an article she had read in which a Zimbabwe politician was quoted as saying that children should study this event closely for it shows that election fraud is not only a third world phenomenon: 1. Imagine that we read of an election occurring anywhere in the third world in which the self-declared winner was the son of the former prime minister and that former prime minister was himself the former head of that nation’s secret police (CIA). 2. Imagine that the self-declared winner lost the popular vote but won based on some old colonial holdover (electoral college) from the nation’s pre-democracy past. 3. Imagine that the self-declared winner’s “victory” turned on disputed votes cast in a province governed by his brother. 4. Imagine that the poorly drafted ballots of one district, a district heavily favoring the self-declared winner’s opponent, led thousands of voters to vote for the wrong candidate. 5. Imagine that members of that nation’s most despised caste, fearing for their lives/livelihoods, turned out in record numbers to vote in near-universal opposition to the self-declared winner’s candidacy. 6. Imagine that hundreds of members of that most-despised caste were intercepted on their way to the polls by state police operating under the authority of the self-declared winner’s brother. 7. Imagine that six million people voted in the disputed province and that the self-declared winner’s “lead” was only 327 votes. Fewer, certainly, than the vote counting machines’ margin of error. 8. Imagine that the self-declared winner and his political party opposed a more careful by-hand inspection and re-counting of the ballots in the disputed province or in its most hotly disputed district. 9. Imagine that the self-declared winner, himself a governor of a major province, had the worst human rights record of any province in his nation and actually led the nation in executions. 10. Imagine that a major campaign promise of the self-declared winner was to appoint like-minded human rights violators to lifetime positions on the high court of that nation. 11. Imagine that the decision whether the hand recounts should be completed and validated rests solely with an official from the self-declared winner’s party, an appointee of the self-declared winner’s brother. None of us would deem such an election to be representative of anything other than the self-declared winner’s will to power. All of us, I imagine, would wearily turn the page thinking that it was just another sad tale of pitiful pre- or anti-democratic peoples in some strange elsewhere. ________ Barney Bate 5311 S Woodlawn, #1 Chicago, IL 60615 H. 773.684.0991 johnbate-AT-midway.uchicago.edu ____________________________________________________________________________ _________ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005