Subject: Re: FW: globalization and Indian film Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:52:06 -0000 Shoshanna, I'd think your friend the art critic meant Raj Kapur, not Raj Kumar. Raj Kumar was a relatively minor actor; Raj Kapur was a big film-maker. The question posed by Jill is not detailed enough to offer an answer easily. Of course there is a lot of material on Indian cinema: Ashish Rajadhyaksha's critical work, Andrew Robinson's study of Satyajit Ray, Wimal Dissanayake's dissection of Bollywood, Rajadhyaksha's monograph of Ghatak -- if globalization is to mean the impact of international cinema on Indian films, then there's a lot of material to look at: the Indian new wave could indeed be traced to Italian neorealism and its impact; many Left-wing Indian film-makers swear by Dovzhenko and Eisenstein as their inspiration. If Jill is looking for popular cinema, Uma Vasudeva's magazine, Cinemaya should have a lot of material, as would Siddharth KAk's defunct magazine Cinema Vision India. If the question, however, is the Cocacolanisation of Indian films, there's little to go by: the basic plot line of a Bollywood blockbuster has not changed over the years, though there's greater sophistication and good use of cinematic techniques. And if globalization is to mean impact of Bollywood overseas, there's growing evidence of it. Many critics have seen Bollywood's influence on Moulin Rouge, the recent film starring Nicole Kidman, and Andrew Lloyd Webber is making a Bollywood-style musical on West End next year. In other words, much water has flown down the Ganges (or Ganga) since 1965..... whether it has been captured in academic writing/scholarly discourse, I don't know, as I don't read such publications. Salil >From: Shoshanna Scholar <scholar-AT-appliedsemantics.com> >Reply-To: postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >To: "'postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu'" ><postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> >Subject: FW: globalization and Indian film >Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:39:45 -0700 > >Jill Didur - > >I asked an art critic friend who specializes in indian film about >globalization and indian film - this was her reply: > >Actually, it's harder than it looks...I searched long and hard for stuff >that was "critical" but also knew about contemporary Indian film. Anything >of any academic stature at all stops at around 1965 with classics by Raj >Kumar and the like...and then anything that deals with contemporary popular >film is usually just a glib magazine article talking about how big the >industry is... > >I want to know where all the good stuff is too!!! TX > >Shoshanna Scholar > >-----Original Message----- >From: Shoshanna Scholar >Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 6:33 PM >To: Tessa Laird >Subject: FW: globalization and Indian film > > >thought you might have something to say to this lost canadian academic! > >s > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jill Didur [mailto:jdidur-AT-alcor.concordia.ca] >Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 6:40 AM >To: postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >Subject: globalization and Indian film > > >Hi All > >I'm looking for references on recent critical work examining the impact of >globalization on >Indian cinema. Any suggestions would be appreciated. > >Thank you, >Jill Didur. >Concordia University >Department of English >1455 de Maisonnneuve Blvd. W. >LB-505-2 >Montreal, Quebec >Canada >H3G 1M8 >PHONE: (514) 848-2340 >FAX (514) 848-4501 > > > --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005