Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:07:15 -0500 Subject: Sharon Trial Al-Ahram Weekly Online 28 June - 4 July 2001 Issue No.540 Justice at last? Will Ariel Sharon stand trial for his notorious role in the Sabra and Shatila massacre? As Rasha Saad reports, it now seems more possible than ever The ghosts of Sabra and Shatila may haunt Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon for the rest of his life. During three terrible days in September 1982, thousands of unarmed Palestinians, including women, children and babies, were killed, tortured, raped or vanished in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila. It was Sharon, then Israeli defence minister, who allowed a Lebanese Christian militia allied to Israel, the Phalange, to enter the camps and brutally murder the refugees. Now, 19 years later, a court of law may at last charge Sharon for his bloody crimes. On 18 June, three lawyers filed a complaint against the Israeli prime minister on behalf of 28 survivors of the massacre in a Belgian court. The charges include war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. The petitioners have filed their complaint under a 1993 law (modified in 1999), which allows war criminals to be tried in Belgium whatever their nationality and wherever those crimes took place. Heads of state may also be charged. According to the law, a complaint is filed for a fact and not against a person, so "the magistrates are now generally investigating the massacre and the responsibilities of everyone," Michael Verhaeghe, a Belgian and one of the three lawyers filing the complaint told Al-Ahram Weekly. He added that Sharon was "on top" of the list of those investigated. On Monday, the magistrate confirmed to Verhaeghe that there is a good chance the case will be accepted. This paves the way for Sharon to be charged in Brussels. Sharon has been accused before. In 1983, Israel's Kahan Commission found Sharon indirectly to blame for the massacre. Public horror forced him to resign from his post as defence minister. But Soad Sorour, a survivor of the massacre, stood in front of a Belgian magistrate this week, and on behalf of the other witnesses asked for more than Kahan's "moral" justice. Sorour, who was 16 when the massacre happened, is vowing to bring legal justice to the victims and to prove that Sharon, by not intervening to stop the massacre, is directly to blame. "I hope Sharon is tried and hanged for what he did... He presents himself as a man of peace, but everyone knows what he did," she said. Militiamen raped Sorour repeatedly during the massacre, before shooting her in the back. The bullet is still stuck in her spine. All 28 witnesses in the trial lost close family members. Sometimes mother, father, brother and sister were slaughtered. Lawyers presenting the case are hopeful, especially after the conviction of two Rwandan nuns earlier this month for complicity in genocide. That was the first successful prosecution under the 1993 Belgian law. Verhaeghe said that there is much evidence pointing to Sharon's personal responsibility. He met Phalange leaders beforehand and, as Israel's defence minister, let them enter the Sabra and Shatila camps. He well knew their enmity towards the Palestinians, and their bloodthirsty methods. Verhaeghe added that every report confirms that the invading Israeli Defence Forces watched the massacre but did nothing. Verhaeghe concluded that "they [Sharon and his forces] were not playing the violin: but they wrote the opera and conducted the orchestra." But the case may run less smoothly than hoped. Brussels faces growing calls from the rest of Europe to abandon the 1993 law. Belgian officials are concerned too; they fear the law will unleash a flood of cases and eventually embarrass the government. "We are aware of this problem. [But] if the Belgian parliament cancels this law it will be an injustice," said Chiblli Mallat, a Lebanese lawyer who is one of the three lawyers presenting the case. Mallat is relying on speed. He hopes the case will end "before the parliament takes serious steps to abandon the law." The three lawyers have been preparing the case for more than six months. But the filing of the complaint coincided with the 17 June showing of a BBC documentary The Accused which considers Sharon's role in the Sabra and Shatila massacre. "This is a mere coincidence but a fortunate one. I think it is in both sides' interests, especially after the campaign launched by Israel against the documentary," Mallat told the Weekly. The documentary shows horrific scenes from the refugee camp, filmed a day after the Lebanese militia left. It also features witnesses, including Sorour. After interviewing law experts, and Israeli and US officials who were in office during the massacre, the programme concludes that there are sufficient grounds for indicting Sharon for war crimes. Israel's press, by contrast, campaigned against the documentary and Israeli officials accused the BBC of anti-Semitism. Sharon is under attack from other sides, too. US-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) has urged a criminal investigation into Sharon's role in the massacre. "There is abundant evidence that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed on a wide scale in the Sabra and Shatila massacre, but to date, not a single individual has been brought to justice," said Hani Megally, executive director of HRW's Middle East and North Africa division. The group's call came as Sharon began his visit to Washington on Tuesday. In a statement, HRW asked US President George Bush to discuss the matter with Sharon during their meetings. The group also said that the US has an interest in the case because Israel's occupation of west Beirut came after written US assurances that Palestinians remaining there would be safe. HRW concluded that Israel's Kahan Commission report "cannot substitute for proceedings in a criminal court in Israel or elsewhere that will bring to justice those responsible for the killing of hundreds of innocent civilians." "It is a very positive sign. The report comes from one of the biggest human rights groups, speaking in the US, where there is a black-out on news about the complaint we have filed," commented Verhaeghe. He added, "The call by Human Rights Watch clearly [says] that political analysis of the Sabra and Shatila massacre is not enough. Justice can only be served with a proper and independent criminal investigation." For Mallat, that all these disparate efforts to bring Sharon to justice have coincided shows "a tremendous universal feeling that the massacre of Sabra and Shatila is a shocking crime whose perpetrators are left unpunished." It has taken 19 years. --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005