File spoon-archives/postcolonial.archive/postcolonial_2001/postcolonial.0110, message 152


Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 19:53:22 -0400
Subject: Re: THE FIRST POST-ATTACK BUZZFLASH WORLD MEDIA WATCH
From: "bob brown" <vacirca-AT-charm.net>


> THIS MESSAGE IS IN MIME FORMAT. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--MS_Mac_OE_3085415604_584546_MIME_Part

hi   pegg,  i'm trying to find another confirmation of both stories haven't
seen any thing, and i don't know anything about the source BUZZFLASH used. i
figure if its true we'll hear about it sooner or later.hopefully not later!!
the nytimes today made a fleeting reference to chinese lukewarm assent to
the bombing raid, and  no mention of chinese muslim troops. but if there are
chinese troops  in afghanistan i'm sure we'll hear about it, the tactical
nuclear weapons we are likely not to hear about unless they'r used and even
then maybe not. thee nytimes admits that bush admitted that americans ared
scared of what's coming next and where all this is going.  the tremendous
psychic weiight  of  S11 is hanging over everyone's head it has radically
altered all the old political equations.

personally my guess is both stories are true. bob
--
"solidarity means sharing the same risks" - Che
( la solidarita significa correre gli stessi rischi)

----------
From: Margaret Trawick <trawick-AT-clear.net.nz>
To: postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Subject: Re: THE FIRST POST-ATTACK BUZZFLASH WORLD MEDIA WATCH
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2001, 6:48 PM


Bob - Are there any independent reports to confirm or disconfirm what
BuzzFlash says in the stuff you posted?  Some of the reports appear trivial
and misleading, but the first two are genuinely alarming.


--MS_Mac_OE_3085415604_584546_MIME_Part

HTML VERSION:

Re: THE FIRST POST-ATTACK BUZZFLASH WORLD MEDIA WATCH hi   pegg,  i'm trying to find another confirmation of both stories haven't seen any thing, and i don't know anything about the source BUZZFLASH used. i figure if its true we'll hear about it sooner or later.hopefully not later!! the nytimes today made a fleeting reference to chinese lukewarm assent to the bombing raid, and  no mention of chinese muslim troops. but if there are chinese troops  in afghanistan i'm sure we'll hear about it, the tactical nuclear weapons we are likely not to hear about unless they'r used and even then maybe not. thee nytimes admits that bush admitted that americans ared scared of what's coming next and where all this is going.  the tremendous psychic weiight  of  S11 is hanging over everyone's head it has radically altered all the old political equations.

personally my guess is both stories are true. bob
--
"solidarity means sharing the same risks" - Che
( la solidarita significa correre gli stessi rischi)

----------
From: Margaret Trawick <trawick-AT-clear.net.nz>
To: postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Subject: Re: THE FIRST POST-ATTACK BUZZFLASH WORLD MEDIA WATCH
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2001, 6:48 PM


Bob - Are there any independent reports to confirm or disconfirm what BuzzFlash says in the stuff you posted?  Some of the reports appear trivial and misleading, but the first two are genuinely alarming.

--MS_Mac_OE_3085415604_584546_MIME_Part-- --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005