File spoon-archives/postcolonial.archive/postcolonial_2001/postcolonial.0110, message 242


Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:01:51 -0500
From: Clarisse Zimra <czimra-AT-siu.edu>
Subject: Re: spivak or?


>
  Dear people,

Since I've been away and have NO what clue what the controversy is 
all about that prompted eldorra's post, it is the tenor that I found 
unnecessary.  I know that the first part of my sentence (ie. I have 
no clue) will prompt some to disqualify me from commenting on the 
debate: which is why I was careful to indicate I did NOT wish to take 
sides nor curtail anyone's right to speak.

Simply, I did not think the argument was served by its language. I'd 
be much obliged if someone on the list could let me/us know what this 
original argument was.

With amused courtesy to one and all, I shall now exit the debate. Cheers! cz
-- 
Clarisse Zimra
Southern Illinois U. at Carbondale 62901 - 4503
private office: 618 453 68 13
message/secretary: 618 453 53 21
fax/télécopie  618 453 82 24 / or 618 453 32 53


     --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005