Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:01:51 -0500 From: Clarisse Zimra <czimra-AT-siu.edu> Subject: Re: spivak or? > Dear people, Since I've been away and have NO what clue what the controversy is all about that prompted eldorra's post, it is the tenor that I found unnecessary. I know that the first part of my sentence (ie. I have no clue) will prompt some to disqualify me from commenting on the debate: which is why I was careful to indicate I did NOT wish to take sides nor curtail anyone's right to speak. Simply, I did not think the argument was served by its language. I'd be much obliged if someone on the list could let me/us know what this original argument was. With amused courtesy to one and all, I shall now exit the debate. Cheers! cz -- Clarisse Zimra Southern Illinois U. at Carbondale 62901 - 4503 private office: 618 453 68 13 message/secretary: 618 453 53 21 fax/télécopie 618 453 82 24 / or 618 453 32 53 --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005