Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:35:22 -0700 (MST)
From: Raul Sanchez <Raul.Sanchez-AT-m.cc.utah.edu>
Subject: NY Times V.S. Naipaul interview (fwd)


                  Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company
                               The New York Times

                 October 28, 2001, Sunday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section 6; Page 19; Column 1; Magazine Desk

LENGTH: 716 words

HEADLINE: The Way We Live Now: 10-28-01: Questions for V.S. Naipaul;
Literary Criticism

BYLINE:  By Adam Shatz

BODY:
   Q: Although your prose has been universally praised, you remain an
object of considerable controversy. You have been charged with
insensitivity and pandering to Western prejudices in your writings about
Islam.

   Well, that is the trouble with writing about Muslim people. There are
people of the universities who want to run you out of town, and they're
paid to, and so they pay no attention to what you actually say.

   You have described the Taliban as vermin.

   No, that's my wife! She's a Pakistani journalist who for many years
wrote a column. She writes from that kind of perspective.

   Are you surprised by Osama bin Laden's support in Pakistan, Indonesia,
Malaysia and Iran -- countries you wrote about in your travel books on
Islam?

   No, because these are the converted peoples of Islam. To put it
brutally, these are the people who are not Arabs. Part of the neurosis of
the convert is that he always has to prove himself. He has to be more
royalist than the king, as the French say.

   Is this what you mean when you write about Islam's imperial drive to
extend its reach and root out the unbeliever?

   Yes. It is not the unbeliever as the other person so much as the
remnant of the unbeliever in one's customs and in one's ways of thinking.
It's this wish to destroy the past, the ancient soul, the unregenerate
soul. This is the great neurosis of the converted.

   What then makes Islam's appeal so potent?

   I'll tell you something from the eighth century. The first province of
India to be conquered was the province of Sindh, which is today part of
Pakistan. The king of Sindh resisted quite well. Then one day it was
reported to him how the invaders said their prayers in unity as one man,
and the king became frightened. He understood that this was a new force in
the world, and it is what in fact Muslims are very proud of: the union of
people. That idea of brotherhood is very powerful.

   What about nonfundamentalist Islam?

   I think it is a contradiction. It can always be called up to drown and
overwhelm every movement. The idea in Islam, the most important thing, is
paradise. No one can be a moderate in wishing to go to paradise.

   The idea of a moderate state is something cooked up by politicians
looking to get a few loans here and there.

   What do you think were the causes of Sept. 11?

   It had no cause. Religious hate, religious motivation, was the primary
thing. I don't think it was because of American foreign policy. There is a
passage in one of the Conrad short stories of the East Indies where the
savage finds himself with his hands bare in the world, and he lets out a
howl of anger. I think that, in its essence, is what is happening. The
world is getting more and more out of reach of simple people who have only
religion. And the more they depend on religion, which of course solves
nothing, the more the world gets out of reach. The oil money in the 70's
gave the illusion that power had come to the Islamic world.

   It was as though up there was a divine supermarket, and at last it had
become open to people in the Muslim world. They didn't understand that the
goods that gave them power in the end were made by another civilization.
That was intolerable to accept, and it remains intolerable.

   Do you think the events of Sept. 11 influenced the committee's
decision to give you the Nobel Prize?

   I don't know. I thought beginning in 1973 that I was being considered.
And then I felt that great campaigns had been waged against me, quite
successfully.

   By whom?

   People who were pillorying me as a racist and anti the third world.

   Do you find the controversy around your work exhausting?

   No, it doesn't bother me at all. It's important for writers to
generate this kind of hostility. If a writer doesn't generate hostility,
he is dead.

   You have admitted that you are no historian of Islam. Which scholars
of Islam do you rely on?

   No, no, no! I travel, and I meet people, and they tell me about their
lives. I don't need to read the scholars. If I travel in India or Africa,
the best way to go is with a very blank mind and let the facts emerge.

   A scholar would look at these people and draw conclusions. I don't do
that. The reader looks at these people and makes a pattern, and the
pattern depends on the reader.   Adam Shatz




   http://www.nytimes.com
GRAPHIC: Photo (Eamonn McCabe)

LOAD-DATE: October 28, 2001

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.



     --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---