Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:44:52 -0700 Subject: Re: Theory - re pier smiths inquiry & pacific rim... 10 years ago we actually founded a company so that we could do "awareness" for agencies, governments etc for years on First Nations issues. We founded a private company so that we could have quality control of our own theoretical position...and one could argue thereby commodifying it ..more than earning a profit. Needless to say it doesn't earn us a living (we have to teach and etc) but it has provided some satisfaction in extending understanding. The motivation was largely in self defense and to make life more bearable for the next generation. My partner, a Nuu-chah-nulth hawii (an aboriginal/indigenous/Indian/Native American...hereditary chief) and we are community members of Ahousaht which is an island off of Vancouver Island off the coast of British Columbia Canada. I think that one of the Europhilosophers suggested that this area was beyond western civilization so how could we be theorizing.... Indigenous people here talked formally and contractually with each other via an institution labelled as the "Potlatch" which means to give, in Chinook jargon (See Potlatch Papers by Chris Bracken, 1997 Chicago university press) ...the paraphernalia for that formal conversation, meaning making, contracting, was looted and taken by westerners to museums in Europe ...the Royal British keeps some of the most important vehicles of West Coast "theory" in its basement where no one sees it except they ask and the museum refuse repatriation outright because: it belongs to "the people" (curator). So what does one do when the vehicles for the "theory" distilled over thousands of years are distanced....gone... when the paraphernalia are cues that activate whole meaning systems...what happens to the recall to the process to the products...its something we are grappling with... one might see it as as a system with a very basic flaw....its something like the library in Alexandria burning... but textuality is a particular kind of conservation and reproduction of knowledge with its own built in problems...and so now there is work to revisit the indigeneities...how timely.... Embodied/performed "theory" from non-EuroAmerican settings translated/adapted for EuroAmerican audience is a tough one. My partner just dropped of a manuscript to a publisher last week. Interestingly enough the feedback from one of the readers were complaints about how there was too much western material used to compare or critique or explain....well if there wasn't what would the book be doing???!!! its like explaining synesthesia..cross cultural leakage of phenomenon and ategories is hard to explain when one isn't organized by some universals... For example, I was offered the option of doing a performance piece for my dissertation instead of a textual piece. Makes sense. How do we, who have embodied culture in one worldview and language maintain the authority in translation when for centuries...the colonizer has asserted the right to interpret these...Is we struggle to write, in English, and systematize the cultural perspectives as theory the issues are many. There is some work that has been done in indigenous theory and how can it escape being about decolonization also. My own recent dissertation is about how storywork was and still is used in aboriginal education identifying an ideology of Nuu-chah-nulth learning which is systematized as a theory about learning and leadership from which I make recommendations about decolonization. Now there are only about 7,000 Nuu-chah-nulth...the population has "bounced back" from a low of less than 1,000 on the early part of the century...there are few native speakers....so we could say "so what"!... from my perspective it is about the value of diversity. Bio diversity is great...environmentalists go to great lengths...but cultural diversity...well...its expensive...its difficult...when we have been used to the grand narratives...the one way, one size fits all of scientism... The rub is we write about this in English in a comparative perspective. We are now telling it how it is... rather than having someone interpret behaviors in their perspective.... Many of the larger presses are just beginning to be interested as they see the market enlarge. UBC Press, a fairly major academic press in Canada, currently has got several indigenous authors in the process of publication. Academic presses are more likely to fill this need than others. Many North American indigenous peoples have written through the area of education particularly in response to the educational and residential school systems established to colonize more effectively. Also much of the theorizing is about problem solving...talking back on the ground... A sample of some of the people and resources that inform my teaching: New Zealand: Linda Tuhiwai Smith 1999 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books Canada Battiste is a Micmac scholar who has published extensively: eg. 1986 Micmac literacy and cognitive assimilation. J. Barman, Y. Hebert, & Don McCaskill (Eds.) Indian Education in Canada. Vol 1. The legacy. pp.23-44 UBC Press. 2000. Maintaining Aboriginal Identity, Language, and Culture in Modern Society In Battiste, Marie, ed., Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision, 192-208. Vancouver: UBC Press. Sharilyn Calliou 1999 Sunrise: Activism and self-determination in First Nations Education. (1972-1998). J.H. Hylton (Ed.) Aboriginal self government in Canada: Cultural trends and issues (2nd. Ed). (pp. 197-186) Sask Purlich Publishing. 1995 Peacekeeping actions at home: A medicine wheel model for a peacekeeping pedagogy. M. Battiste & J. Barman (Eds). First Nations Education: The circle unfolds. pp. 47-72 Vol. II UBC Press Gerald Taiaiake Alfred, Mohawk, publishes on political science eg. 1999 Peace, Power, Righteousness: an indigenous manifesto. Oxford U Press Eber Hampton 2000 First Nations controlled university education in Canada. In M. Brant Costellano, L. Davis, & L. Lahache (Esd.) Aborignal education: Fulfilling the promise (pp. 120-207). UBC Press. Systematizing indigenous thought as theory in dialogue with western science and bringing it environmental policy post Rio:...available on line. Bunnell & Atleo. E. R. (1995). Clayoquot Sound scientific panel report: First Nations perspectives relating to forest practice standards in Clayoquot Sound.BC Government US Cayete is Pueblo and has written extensively on indigenous science. Oscar Kawagley, A. O. 1995 A Yupiaq worldview: A pathway to ecology and spirit. Prospect Heights, Ill. Waveland Press Inc. Sarris, G. 1993 Keeping Slug woman alive: A holistic approach to American indian texts. Berkley, CA: U of Calif. Press. Duran, Edwardo & Duran, Bonnie 1995 Native American Postcolonial Psychology SUNY Smith, Dean Howard: 2000 Modern Tribal Development: Paths to Self Sufficiency and Cultural Integrity in Indian Country. AltaMira Press. Garrod & Larimore 1997 First Person- First Peoples: Native American college graduates tell their life stories. Cornell UNiversity press. Some have just done great critiques so far: Chrisjohn, Roland & Peters, M. : Right brained indian: fact or fiction? Journal of American Indian Education. Vol 24(2) 1-7. There are so many...aboriginal authors...theorizing in many different venues...
HTML VERSION:
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005