Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:18:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: NYT Op-Ed Salman Rushdie 271102 > Is he ignorant, or does he (Rushdie) choose not to. supposing he wanted to, do you think the Ameri-Israeli media would allow it? the media has final say over what's printed/said which is why anything decent that can be said is relegated to the dissident journals and other things the masses are made unaware of. > Salman continues to spread the rumor > that there are only > crazies, fundamentalists and terrorists i don't think he's saying that. he just happens to focus on them, which i think is human nature to look at the bad before the good. for example if you see a rare flower that is beautiful and then an hour later see a train wreck, which are you going to mention to your friends if there's a choice. probably the train wreck. rushdie happens to be talking about the train wrecks instead of the flowers. unfortunately he happens to be following the status quo which always defaults to the negative because the positive really isn't all that interesting when it comes to selling news. > Is dissidence and > resistance effective or even > legitimate when in the end those that are heard are > recuperated by the > dominant discourse probably not. if there was any legitimacy in terms of affecting the world i think there would be more change. while i enjoy dissident authors and sympathize greatly with socialist and anarchist causes i think that the writers are doing exercizes in futility. no one (the mass populace) is listening or if they are they are not acting. for that matter why should they? no one will join their cause anyway because ppl are to worried about their own sets of issues. gr3g ==== 'every government is a dictatorship. every leader, a tyrant.' -anonymous __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005