Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:26:30 -0500 (EST) From: lewiss-AT-cofc.edu Subject: RE: peter arnett--media objectivity Salil's professionalism is almost always helpful on this list, and even on this issue the distinction between press and television behavior in Britain and the US is useful. However, you don't have to be a die-hard Althusserian to recognize that "objectivity" is ideologically-laden. In some ways you might argue that sticking in obviously value-laden adjectives simply reflects a degree of honesty about oneself as a participant-observer. Leaving out such adjectives doesn't make one objective. When news anchors here in the US use the phrase "War on Terrorism," for instance, should there _not_ be a "so-called" qualifying that phrase? The absence of qualifying phrases in these cases, the result of pressure of time in news broadcasts, results in most TV news at least resorting to the soundbites and phrasing provided for them by press releases (at least, to a non-professional such as me, that is the way it increasingly appears). Any objectivity is heavily compromised by such vigorous truncation and compression. Moreover, this is not just a question of adjectives but clearly of nouns too, abstract ones such as "shock," "awe," "freedom," "democracy", "patriot" (with a small or capital P), common nouns such as "soldier," "paramilitary," "guerrilla," not to mention all of those proper nouns with their supercharge of emotion such as "America," "Saddam" and even, well, maybe, "Blair." It's about verbs, too. I almost drove off the road when NPR news--which I normally trust as most intelligent, most fully informative of the broadcast media here in the US--reported on Turkey's having "failed" to allow the US to station troops in its territory. Maybe that was objective reporting--not doing something can indeed be construed as "failing" to do something. But a democrat (spot my use of ideologically-laden rhetoric) might have reported that Turkey had voted against allowing etc. Finally, it seems to me that this is precisely where academics and folks like me in English departments matter--we, like broadcasters, should be committed to accuracy, and committed to paying due attention to the politics of language. We should vote to fail to use the politicians' "folded lies"--among which is the claim that our view is objective, our language transparent. Simon Simon Lewis Associate Professor of English Editor--Illuminations: An International Magazine of Contemporary Writing http://www.cofc.edu/Illuminations Co-Director--Program in the Carolina Lowcountry and Atlantic World http://www.cofc.edu/Atlanticworld/ Department of English College of Charleston 66 George Street Charleston SC, 29424-0001 Tel: 843-953-1920; Fax: 843-953-3180 --- from list postcolonial-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005