Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 11:09:22 -0800 Subject: Re: PUPT: dodecahedron followup Thanks Jim for the clarification. Sadly- it still needs to be a dodecahedron, not a decahedron for me. Wish I could use it, because it looks lovely. Mary -- Mary Robinette Kowal Other Hand Productions http://www.otherhandproductions.com --- Personal replies to: Mary Robinette Kowal <maryrk-AT-earthlink.net> --- List replies to: puptcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- Admin commands to: majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- Archives at: http://lists.village.virginia.edu/~spoons
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005