File spoon-archives/puptcrit.archive/puptcrit_2002/puptcrit.0206, message 71


Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:35:54 EDT
Subject: Re: PUPT: RE:S.A.A.P.?


In a message dated 6/13/2002 1:49:55 PM Central Daylight Time, 
profwill66-AT-hotmail.com writes:

<< One can only assume that the man 
 suffered one or more of those unfortunate incidents when  misjudgment of a 
 young audience plus failing to prepare them to watch a puppet show combined 
 with lack of adult supervision to result in an "attack".  It happens.  >>

Wow, this sure brought me back. We have all been there, I'm sure, and heavens 
knows parties offer the ideal situation for "attacks." You're walking in on a 
group of kids, usually on their home turf, where they do not feel exposed or 
threatened. Poor Jeff. My, my. Tsk, tsk. Thanks for sharing this item. 
Puppetry is definitely not for the squeamish. Of course I feel fairly able to 
deal, having a black belt in taekwondo and all. One wonders what form of 
protection would be adequate: Clause in contract holding parents liable for 
damage to theater/puppets? A restraining order? Security guard included in 
contract? Electrified fence? Fire hose?
Oh dear, oh goodness,
Alice


  --- Personal replies to: HobgoblinH-AT-aol.com
  --- List replies to:     puptcrit-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
  --- Admin commands to:   majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
  --- Archives at:         http://lists.village.virginia.edu/~spoons

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005