File spoon-archives/sa-cyborgs.archive/sa-cyborgs_1998/sa-cyborgs.9801, message 20


Subject: Re: silence
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:10:32 -0500


Radhika,
This just made me feel i have to say something so i guess to some extent
your message came through to me!
I will say that I don't post too often cos I am not writing too much right
now and certainly not anything that i can share in this medium. Once my film
is done  I would like to post stuff appropriate to this list.  I enjoy
reading most of the stuff that gets posted and certainly your
writings/poems/musings.  I respond when i feel I have something coherent to
say. Which may or may not be the case here!
Keep up the list is all i can say right now.
Uma
-----Original Message-----
From: Cyberdiva <radhik-AT-bgnet.bgsu.edu>
To: sa-cyborgs-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
<sa-cyborgs-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 1998 8:31 AM
Subject: silence


>
>
>very often, I wonder about the silence on this list and why people bother
>to remain subbscribed to a list that doesn't have much exchange...
>
>sometimes i think that if i write enough drivel, it will drive subscribers
>off and i can have a comfy list of one - why not? I'm the only one who
>really posts:).
>
>
>sometimes i wonder if my writing shuts up everyone because they're not
>sure *what* the darn stuff is;)
>
>sometimes i wonder if the lurkers just lurk coz they're too lazy to figure
>out how to unsub ( if so send me a message and i'll unsub you)
>
>as for shutting down this space - i wouldn't dream of  it - but we could
>re design it.
>Now when i say "we" of course i'll be picky about which "we's" ideas i
>incorporate into the actual re-designing of this space (there - right then
>i shut someone up before they even hit the r key) ....
>but we can talk... visibly - so the archives are witness to my autocracy
>if you like
>
>I want to hold on to a "feminist" space. I want to hold on to a space
>that encourages awareness of race, gender, class (the trimurtis of ...
>whatever) and critique of privilege, at the same time I don't want it to
>be a pure theoretical discussion list (we have too many of those floating
>around already). I don't want this list to become just another
>"postcolonial" list.
>
>so how do we do this? suggestions?
>
>silence....
>:)
>
>Tell me about this silence...
>what makes a list silent?
>
>
>lack of purpose?
>
> purpose under whose definition?
>
>content?
>
> content validated by who?
>
>
>or is it the way we approach the word
>
>
>as too sacred to throw about?
>
>
>too sacred not
>to rhyme
>
>as Shakespeare
>did
>
>too sacred not to prose
>
>as Bacon did
>
>too sacred not to
>Theorize and pontificate as
>
>so many of us academics do
>
>too often...
>
>
>i wonder.....
>
>we had 109 members a couple days ago - and i can only wonder why we don't
>just have 1...
>
>
>i mean there can't be much "backchanneling" going on when no one knows
>who's on the list - except the off-list stuff i recieve in response to
>what i post.
>
>
>r
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005