Date: Thu, 20 Jul 1995 11:59:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Karen L Houle <khoule-AT-uoguelph.ca> Subject: Re: continuities m: have I got this right? the impression of continuity of time is a by-product of the film rather than a deliberate inscribed track from the outset? and you think that what altman was doing or has "achieved" or the film has achieved of its own chemistry, is actually to deny that continuity? in otherwords, that there are blips or lags or losses of reaction or lines of probable affect that do not come to any changes within or underneath the distracting varnish of what appears to be a "traditional" timing presentation? How, on a personal level, does this translate into a moral resonance? karen --- from list seminar-10-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005