Date: Tue, 24 Jan 1995 16:15:54 +1000
From: amiles-AT-netspace.net.au (Adrian Miles)
Subject: Re: Distance


>Melissa wrote:
>
>> What confuses me a little about this thread is that I am not sure what
>> Malgosia would be referring to as Eisensteins "rhetoric" if not
>> precisely the theory of the montage of attractions.
>
>Yes, I _am_ referring to the montage of attractions.
>
>and THEN she wrote:  (!!!)
>
>> I would have thought that in discussing Eisenstein's theory of attractions,
>> (and this is in Cinema 2, maybe it is absent in C 1 - I'm not sure),
>> Deleuze was precisely (gotta stop using that word) addressing the
>> propagandist-rhetorical element, [...]
>
>He discusses it in C2???  And nobody has said anything???
>
>
>- malgosia

I didn't know either, only up to chapter 5 in C2 :(.

Adrian Miles



     ------------------