Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 15:06:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bryan Alexander <balexand-AT-beta.centenary.edu>
Subject: Re: Leibniz (sources)


Thanks for moving to speak, A.!
	Let me fire away as well (have people received my two rants?).
I'm a freshly-minted PhD now teaching at a Shreveport liberal-arts
college.  In English I specialize in eighteenth-century and Romantic lit,
while doing that theory thang.
	THE FOLD is one of the last Deleuze works for me to read, and it
always seduces and terrifies me.  His style is so careful,
intimately-wrought, charming, and referential that I cannot resist; yet
the breadth of his referentiality and my baby-level Leibniz stun me at
every other page.  One of the reasons I helped start this gorup up is to
get some help...

Bryan Alexander
Centenary College of Louisiana

On Thu, 11 Sep 1997 br00516-AT-binghamton.edu wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> As far as I can tell, no discussion has begun. I do have some things to
> say about ch. 1, but I'll save them for another post (my books and I are
> separated right now). For now, I merely wanted to introduce myself and say
> that I have nd (due to past attempts to read _Le Pli_, as well as my own
> research on Leibniz) a lot of the Leibniz articles and letters that D.
> cites, and I'd be willing to try and be a good resource for those on the
> discussion that are looking for more detail on those works...
> This only includes the French pieces, since I don't read Latin (often,
> the citation gives a piece's name in French, and it turns out to be in
> Latin).  
> 
> Regards,
> Alejandro
> 
> 
> -------- from list seminar-11-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu -------
> 


-------- from list seminar-11-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu -------