Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 02:08:28 +0200 (MET DST)
From: p_petiot-AT-euronet.nl (PETIOT_Pierre)
Subject: Re: death in life



>Again, I am simply asking you to move your
>thoughts along this as a way of starting at a point of the most
>possibilities instead of the least.

That's a critically important methodological remark.

---

Now global remarks about the original post:
 
You cannot speak of anything like abolishing the State 
which concretely means suppressing the police and courts and prisons and all,
without taking more than seriously into account the <suggestions> of Celine.

There are societies in which there is no State. 
We should check that, but my feeling is that, except in the very few late 
thousands of years 
(which strictly speaking is peanuts), 
mankind survived quite well, without any State, WITH murder and not too much 
morality about it, 
except of course VENDETTA.

Objectively, freedom of killing never ceased to be there... and vendetta also. 

It is very easy to have a concrete study of what we are discussing, just 
look to what tribes do.
(I am too theoricist, they say...)

---

A figure... 
In France in 80% of the cases, the murderer and the murdered know each other 
very well... 
Indeed.
I mean that if the family itself could be abolished, 80% of the murders 
would be saved. 
That would leave some space for different sorts of initiatives.

Pierre

*
Pierre PETIOT
See also...
http://www.euronet.nl/users/p_petiot/poiein/poiein.html
http://www.euronet.nl/users/p_petiot/index.html